Smith v. Schiele
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Fitzgerald, C.
Action to recover brokers’ commissions for negotiating a sale of defendant’s land.
Phelps & Smith were the brokers, and plaintiff, who succeeded to their claim, had judgment. Defendant appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
*147The questions presented by this appeal for decision arise out of the following state of facts: On February 14, 1887, defendant executed to Phelps & Smith the following contract of employment: —
“ San Josi, February 14, 1887.
“I, the undersigned, do hereby authorize Phelps & Smith solely to sell the following real estate as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duffy v. HobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Ex Parte McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.