Legal Opinion

Flach v. Gottschalk Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1898PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.), where the case was tried without a jury. The cause was submitted to the Full Bench on briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

There are. two questions brought up by the record in this case — the one as to the sufficiency of a replication to which the appellant demurred, and the other as to the admissibility of evidence. The replication raises the question as to a lunatic’s liability on his contract, and that particular question as now presented has not hitherto been distinctly considered and settled in Maryland.

The suit was brought in April, eighteen hundred and ninety-six by the appellee against the appellant to recover the price of two barrels of whiskey sold by the former to the latter in 1894. The appellant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chew v. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  2. Bank v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. South Baltimore Co. v. MuhlbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. City Bank v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  2. Whitney, Exec. v. HalibutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Fields v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Mendenhall v. School District No. 83Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API