Crane v. McCormick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of-’ Stanislaus County, and from an order denying a, naw trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
On September 30,1866, the defendants authorized De Jarnatt & Crane to sell certain real estate at any time within a year, and agreed to pay them five per cent on thirty-five thousand dollars, the limited price, and one half of any excess of that amount which might be realized from the sale. The written authorization contained the following provision: “And in consideration of your expenses and efforts in attracting settlers to the county, it is agreed that in event of the withdrawal of said property from sale, or in event of sale through any means during the continuance of this power (one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gilbert v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Metro. Loan Ass'n v. EscheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- De Gaze v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.