City Savings Bank v. Enos
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The complaint alleges the following facts: That on December 14,1889, one Francisco José Pereira had on deposit in plaintiff’s bank over $1,000, and on May 24, 1890, he had there on deposit over $150; that on the first of these dates plaintiff paid to defendant’s intestate $1,000, at the latter’s instance and request, and on the second date it paid him $150, / ‘under the representation by said Sylvar to said bank, that he had authority from Francisco José Pereira to collect and receive” the said sums; that at these several dates said Sylvar executed to the bank a receipt for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cowdery v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Roche v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Miller v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.