Pellaton v. Brunski
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to recover the sum of $2,750 as a commission under a broker’s contract providing for the exclusive sale of certain real property.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant entered into the contract on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1922, and that by its terms he was authorized to sell the property in question for the sum of $55,000 upon a five per cent commission. The complaint, proceeding, recites that on the nineteenth day of December following plaintiff obtained a purchaser for the property described in the agreement who was then and there ready, willing, and able to complete the purchase…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.