Legal Opinion

Pellaton v. Brunski

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1924No. Civ. No. 4807PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover the sum of $2,750 as a commission under a broker’s contract providing for the exclusive sale of certain real property.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant entered into the contract on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1922, and that by its terms he was authorized to sell the property in question for the sum of $55,000 upon a five per cent commission. The complaint, proceeding, recites that on the nineteenth day of December following plaintiff obtained a purchaser for the property described in the agreement who was then and there ready, willing, and able to complete the purchase…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API