Legal Opinion
Merkeley v. Fisk
California Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1919No. Sac. No. 2724PublishedCited by 29 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
In this action to recover a commission of $3,227.55 for the alleged sale of real estate the plaintiffs’ cause of action arises out of the execution by and between the plaintiffs and defendants of two written agreements. The first one executed and dated November 19, 1913, is as follows:
“This agreement, made this 19th day of November, 1913, between Katherine B. Fisk, Emma T. B. Beardslee, and Ovedia A. White, as executrices of the last will and testament, and of the estate of W. E. Lovdal, deceased, the parties of the first part, and Merkeley, Chittenden & Keller, a co-partnership, the parties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Baumgartner v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.