Legal Opinion
Mente & Co. v. Fresno Compress & Warehouse Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1931No. Docket No. 363PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.
Appellant, plaintiff in the action, is a Louisiana corporation, dealing in bags, burlaps, twines and supplies of similar nature at New Orleans. About October 3,1925, it entered into a contract with respondent for the sale to the latter of four cars of rewoven jute patches and one car of second-hand patches at the price of 8 cents per pound, each car to be of a minimum weight of 30,000 pounds. The contract was negotiated and entered into in California by an agent of appellant and a manager of the respondent.
The contract provided as follows: “One car of each, ship at…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Meister v. MensingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re United Air Lines, Inc., Debtor. U.S. Bank National Association, Cross-Appellee v. United Air Lines, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Olson v. Biola Cooperative Raisin Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.