Legal Opinion

Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. Yeoman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3416PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

In this action there was a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant has appealed therefrom, adopting the alternative method in bringing up the record. There is printed in appellant’s brief material portions of the judgment-roll and such evidence as is relevant to a consideration of the questions presented.

The cause of action alleged in the complaint was for the recovery of a sum of money as liquidated damages arising under a term of a contract made by defendant with the plaintiff. In the record presented it is shown that the plaintiff was, at all times material to the controversy, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Nakagawa v. OkamotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Potter v. AhrensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Consolidated Lumber Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Brown v. Staple Cotton Co-operative Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  3. List v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. SchulteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API