Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. Yeoman
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
In this action there was a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant has appealed therefrom, adopting the alternative method in bringing up the record. There is printed in appellant’s brief material portions of the judgment-roll and such evidence as is relevant to a consideration of the questions presented.
The cause of action alleged in the complaint was for the recovery of a sum of money as liquidated damages arising under a term of a contract made by defendant with the plaintiff. In the record presented it is shown that the plaintiff was, at all times material to the controversy, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Nakagawa v. OkamotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Potter v. AhrensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Consolidated Lumber Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by32 opinions
- Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brown v. Staple Cotton Co-operative Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
- List v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. SchulteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.