Legal Opinion

Meister v. Mensinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2014No. H036861PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Appellants Robert Meister, Janice Meister and Kathryn Meister (hereafter collectively the Meisters) were preferred shareholders in Sesame Technologies, Inc. (Sesame), a now dissolved software company. Respondent Duane Mensinger (Mensinger) was Sesame’s chief financial officer and respondent Carl Koppel (Koppel) was its chief executive officer. Sesame experienced financial difficulties, and its assets were sold to a company, respondent ExtraView Corporation (ExtraView), 1 formed and owned by Mensinger. Sesame then dissolved, rendering the Meisters’ preferred shares valueless.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Chad Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Grebow v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Cent. Laborers' Pension Fund v. McAfee, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API