Legal Opinion

Rice v. Schmid

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1941No. L. A. 17840PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for damages in the sum of $712.45 for breach of a contract to purchase flour. Being dissatisfied with the amount of the judgment, he brings this appeal.

Plaintiff is a wholesale flour merchant. On July 16, 1937, he entered into a written contract with John Schmid, the proprietor of the Eagle Bakery, in which he agreed to sell to Schmid 6,000 barrels of flour at the following prices:

BARRELS PRICE PER BARREL

2,000 “Ravalli” brand wheat flour at.........$7.10

2,750 “Gold Cross” brand wheat flour at...... 7.65

1,250 “Isis” brand wheat flour at............ 7.15

The contract…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. McCarthy v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API