Cuthill v. Peabody
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered and entered in favor of the defendants upon an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint without leave to apiend.
The plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants the sum of $1,000 as the purchase price of one hundred shares of the corporate capital stock of the Sunset Dredging and Development Company, which stock it is alleged the defendants contracted to buy from plaintiff.
The contract sued on is not alleged in the complaint to have been expressed in writing nor pleaded in haec verba. The gist of the action,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Pollen v. . Le RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Davis v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Mente & Co. v. Fresno Compress & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.