Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Anthony

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1916No. Civ. No. 1642PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Adolphus E. Graupner, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought to recover from the defendant one thousand dollars deposited with him by the plaintiff in conformity with the terms of a written agreement entered into between them.

When plaintiff’s case was concluded defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was granted, and judgment was rendered and entered thereon. The appeal is from such judgment.

The testimony introduced shows that the plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with the Western Motor Car Company, the trade name under which the defendant Anthony did business. The contract was a lengthy instrument, providing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Patent Brick Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Credit Clearance Bureau v. George A. Hochbann Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Brawley v. Crosby Research Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Kane v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API