Farley v. Cory
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
We consider whether taxpayers have standing to sue the Controller, a state official, for mandatory injunctive and declaratory relief seeking to compel his exercise of discretion. We hold only that the taxpayers have standing. On the record before us, we conclude that the affirmative relief sought, if appropriate, must await a full hearing before the trial court. We reverse and remand.
Proceedings Below
In the first of the two consolidated cases, plaintiffs (Slettland and Kemer) filed a taxpayers’ suit for injunctive and declaratory relief in the superior court alleging three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Akau v. Olohana Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Waste Management v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.