Legal Opinion

California State Employees' Ass'n v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1970No. Civ. 12059PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

The issue here is whether statutes and a contract calling for the conduct of administrative tasks of the state’s Medi-Cal program by private carriers violate article XXIV, the civil service amendment of the state Constitution.

Several California decisions hold that this provision inhibits “contracting out” state activities or tasks to private firms or persons. (Burum v. State Comp. Ins. Funds (1947) 30 Cal.2d 575 [184 P.2d 505]; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Riley (1937) 9 Cal.2d 126 [69 P.2d 985, 111 A.L.R. 1503]; Stockburger v. Riley (1937) 21 Cal.App.2d 165 [68 P.2d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API