California State Employees' Ass'n v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
The issue here is whether statutes and a contract calling for the conduct of administrative tasks of the state’s Medi-Cal program by private carriers violate article XXIV, the civil service amendment of the state Constitution.
Several California decisions hold that this provision inhibits “contracting out” state activities or tasks to private firms or persons. (Burum v. State Comp. Ins. Funds (1947) 30 Cal.2d 575 [184 P.2d 505]; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Riley (1937) 9 Cal.2d 126 [69 P.2d 985, 111 A.L.R. 1503]; Stockburger v. Riley (1937) 21 Cal.App.2d 165 [68 P.2d…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.