Legal Opinion

Akau v. Olohana Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1982No. 7275PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Plaintiffs Akau and others brought this class action to enforce alleged rights-of-way along once public trails to the beach that cross original defendants’ 1 property in Kawaihae on the Big Island of Hawaii. The court below ruled that plaintiffs have standing to assert the rights of the public, and certified the suit as a class action. We affirm.

I

The named plaintiffs have lived or fished in Kawaihae for many years. They represent two subclasses; one contains Hawaii residents who used or were deterred from using the trails, the other contains all persons…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hawaii's Thousand Friends v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pele Defense Fund v. Puna Geothermal VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API