Akau v. Olohana Corp.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
Plaintiffs Akau and others brought this class action to enforce alleged rights-of-way along once public trails to the beach that cross original defendants’ 1 property in Kawaihae on the Big Island of Hawaii. The court below ruled that plaintiffs have standing to assert the rights of the public, and certified the suit as a class action. We affirm.
I
The named plaintiffs have lived or fished in Kawaihae for many years. They represent two subclasses; one contains Hawaii residents who used or were deterred from using the trails, the other contains all persons…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Hawaii's Thousand Friends v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Pele Defense Fund v. Puna Geothermal VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.