Legal Opinion

CHIATELLO v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 2010No. A126234PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

This court has repeatedly recognized that “money is the lifeblood of modem government. Money comes primarily from taxes, and, as the importance of a predictable income stream from taxes has grown, governments at all levels have established procedures to minimize disruptions” that would interfere with essential public operations. (Batt v. City and County of San Francisco (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 65, 71 [65 Cal.Rptr.3d 716] (Batt); see Flying Dutchman Park, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1129, 1135-1136 [113 Cal.Rptr.2d 690] (Flying Dutchman);…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Reynolds v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Takhar v. People ex rel. Feather River Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Cal. Dui Lawyers Ass'n v. Cal. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API