Legal Opinion
California Association for Safety Education v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1994No. H011544PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Appellants ask that the state pay for driver training for public high school students. They claim moneys from the Drivers Training Penalty Assessment Fund (DTPAF) should be used for this purpose. (Pen. Code, § 1464; Ed. Code, § 41304.) After the trial court denied their petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction, appellants filed this appeal.
On appeal, they argue (1) fees charged by a high school district for driver training violate the free school guarantee of the California Constitution (Cal. Const., art. IX, § 5); (2) the refusal to use DTPAF funds to pay for…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.