Stephenson v. Stephenson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
An order awarding payments and attorney fees pendente lite is an interlocutory decree. Previously, however, this Court has held that such orders affect a substantial right, and we have allowed immediate appellate review under G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27(d). Peeler v. Peeler, 7 N.C. App. 456, 459, 172 S.E. 2d 915, 917 (1970).
It is significant that when Peeler was decided, along with Kearns v. Kearns, 6 N.C. App. 319, 170 S.E. 2d 132 (1969), and other seminal decisions establishing the direct appeal of pendente lite awards as a matter of right, the situation was different with both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Peeler v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Kearns v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Mayer v. MayerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Berger v. BergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Wolfe v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.