Legal Opinion

Berger v. Berger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 831DC212 and 831DC801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

I

The first order from which defendant appeals is the 11 October order denying his Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss.

We first consider defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying both his motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and his motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. G.S. 1A-1, Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Generally, orders denying motions to dismiss are interlocutory and nonappealable, the reason being to prevent delay and expense from fragmentary appeals and to expedite the administration of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. O'Neill v. Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United Accounts, Inc. v. Teladvantage, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hart v. F.N. Thompson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Howze v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Anglin-Stone v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API