Legal Opinion

Veazey v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1950No. 743PublishedCited by 586 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

We are confronted at the threshold of this appeal by the assertion of the defendant that Judge Burney had no power to try the cause during the week beginning on 14 March, 1949, and that in consequence the verdict and judgment must be set aside and a new trial awarded without regard to whether the trial on the merits conformed to pertinent legal principles. The defendant urges two lines of reasoning to sustain this position.

It argues initially that its appeal from the order of Judge Nimocks denying its motion for a compulsory reference transferred jurisdiction of this case from the Superior…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Guilford v. . Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by586 opinions

  1. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Gaunt v. PittawayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

581 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API