Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Wolfe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 8220DC1096PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff and additional party defendant Sugg assign as error the trial court’s order joining Sugg as a party to the action below. Sugg was purportedly brought into the suit pursuant to the motion of defendant. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 14 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant may bring in an additional party who “is or may be liable to (defendant) for all or part of the plaintiffs claims against him.” Rule 14(a). Clearly, Sugg could not possibly be liable to defendant for any of plaintiffs claims against defendant for child custody or child support. The trial court erred in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Matter of Custody of PealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In re L.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Banks v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Dugie v. CameronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wolfe v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API