Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8210DC727PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

For defendant to have a right of appeal from a mandatory preliminary injunction, “substantial rights” of the appellant must be adversely affected. G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27. Otherwise, an appeal from such an interlocutory order is subject to being dis missed. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian School, 299 N.C. 351, 261 S.E. 2d 908, appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 807, 101 S.Ct. 55, 66 L.Ed. 2d 11 (1980); Smart v. Smart, 59 N.C. App. 533, 297 S.E. 2d 135 (1982). Generally, a right is “substantial” only if it would be lost if the ruling or order is not reviewed before final…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Pruitt v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Stephenson v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Smart v. SmartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. Sheriff of Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Berger v. BergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Stancil v. StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Collins v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Little v. StognerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API