Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff’s appeal from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment is interlocutory. It “does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy.” Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 362, 57 S.E.2d 377, 381, reh’g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). Generally there is no right to appeal from an interlocutory order. Id.
An interlocutory order may, however, be appealed by one of two avenues. First, where more than one claim for relief is presented in an action or the action…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Bob Timberlake Collection, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Rousselo v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.