Legal Opinion

Kearns v. Kearns

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 6922SC331PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Since plaintiff has brought forward no exceptions or assignments of error, her appeal is deemed abandoned under Rule 19(c), Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals.

The first question to be answered is whether the temporary-order entered by the court is one from which an appeal may be taken. This question is raised by plaintiff’s written motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal as being an appeal from a temporary order not affecting a substantial right. Under the totality of the circumstances of this case we hold that the case is properly before us.

Defendant contends that the portion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. In Re GibbonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Peeler v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Stephenson v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Wolfe v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API