Legal Opinion
Lano Equipment, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1987No. C4-86-1410PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Clark Equipment Company appeals from the trial court’s temporary injunction order, contending that the court abused its discretion.
FACTS
Appellant Clark Equipment, Inc., is a Delaware corporation whose business unit, Melroe Company, (collectively “Melroe”) manufactures Bobcat “skid-steer” loaders and distributes them to 606 dealerships in the U.S. and Canada. Melroe presently commands 54% of the skid-steer loader market in Minnesota.
Respondent Lano Equipment, Inc., (Lano) is a dealer of agricultural and construction equipment located in Shakopee, Minnesota. Partly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Saliterman v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- City of St. Paul v. CarloneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- FIRST PRIORITY EMERGENCY VEHICLES, INC. v. REV AMBULANCE GROUP ORLANDO, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.