Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 2002No. C2-01-2010PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellants Minnesota Twins Partnership and Major League Baseball challenge the temporary injunction (1) requiring the Twins to play their 2002 home schedule at the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome stadium; (2) enjoining Major League Baseball from interfering with the contract; (3) enjoining the Twins from taking action that would prevent them from playing their 2002 home schedule at the Metro-dome; and (4) enjoining the sale of the Twins unless the new owner agrees to comply with the lease terms requiring the Twins to play their 2002 home schedule at the Metrodome.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Qwest Communications Co. v. Free Conferencing Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Minnesota Vikings Football Stadium, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchwanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Peer Review ActionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.