Legal Opinion
Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1988No. C9-88-466PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
Sunny Fresh appeals an order denying its motion for temporary injunction, contending that the trial court abused its discretion. We affirm the trial court’s order.
FACTS
Appellant Sunny Fresh is a Delaware corporation with an egg processing facility in Monticello, Minnesota. In addition to other egg products, Sunny Fresh developed and currently produces a grilled scrambled egg square.
Respondents Kevin Speckman and Leonard Robertson were employees of Sunny Fresh. They signed a confidentiality agreement at the commencement of their employment. They agreed that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Drabik v. MartzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988