Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. Carlone
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 16, 1988No. C5-87-1779PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This appeal is from the trial court’s temporary injunction prohibiting Carlone from using his property at 361 W. 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, for nude or semi-nude dancing or any other adult use as classified by St. Paul’s zoning ordinances, without first obtaining a special condition use permit. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 25, 1987, the City of St. Paul (St. Paul) moved to temporarily enjoin Patrick Carlone, et al (Carlone) from operating an establishment known as Playboy Lounge. St. Paul claims the Playboy Lounge is an “adult use” establishment, specifically an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. HeftyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Satellite Industries, Inc. v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Lano Equipment, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Islip v. CavigliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Di Ma Corp. v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997