Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1988No. C9-88-466Published

1DissentCrippen, Judge

The Minnesota Supreme Court has announced the five considerations which are relevant in deciding whether the trial court has abused its discretion in granting or denying a temporary injunction. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 272 Minn. 264, 274-75, 137 N.W.2d 314, 321-22 (1965). Identification of these standards is a settled matter of Minnesota law which has not been disturbed by subsequent appellate decisions.

By rule Minnesota trial court decisions granting or refusing temporary injunctions are to be accompanied by findings of fact identifying the grounds for the court’s decision.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Lano Equipment, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Voluntary Dissolution of Quintar, Inc. v. MBC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API