Legal Opinion

Cappuccio v. Tufts

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1930No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARMER, J., pro tem.

This is an action by which a tenant seeks to recover damages for eviction by the landlord. The facts are as follows:

May 1, 1925, the plaintiff herein entered into a lease for an orange and lemon grove consisting of 28 acres, approximately one-half oranges and one-half lemons. The term of said lease was five years; the rental provided for in said lease was one-half of the crop; the tenant agreed to cultivate, irrigate, prune, etc., the trees in said grove and to pick the crop and deliver to the landlord his portion of the fruit on the premises or at the railroad station or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Schumann v. KarrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hamer v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Klein v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landon v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Lindenberg v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lindenberg v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API