Legal Opinion

Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 10056PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $26,349.36. On the twenty-ninth day of November, 1919, the defendant purchased from the plaintiffs through W. J. Withers, a broker, a quantity of Chinese shelled peanuts. The contract was reduced to writing, and the provisions thereof with which we are here concerned are as follows: “Quantity: One hundred (100) tons. Article and description: Chinese shelled peanuts, 30/32s from Shanghai, F.A.Q. (fair, average quality) of the season. Package: Usual. Price: Thirteen cents (13(i) per pound, F.O.B. coast, duty…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API