Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $26,349.36. On the twenty-ninth day of November, 1919, the defendant purchased from the plaintiffs through W. J. Withers, a broker, a quantity of Chinese shelled peanuts. The contract was reduced to writing, and the provisions thereof with which we are here concerned are as follows: “Quantity: One hundred (100) tons. Article and description: Chinese shelled peanuts, 30/32s from Shanghai, F.A.Q. (fair, average quality) of the season. Package: Usual. Price: Thirteen cents (13(i) per pound, F.O.B. coast, duty…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.