Legal Opinion
Landon v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1934No. Docket No. 4779PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This is an action for damages for eviction brought by a lessee. Theo. K. Hill was the owner of certain premises consisting of a store and certain bakery equipment in the town of Anderson, Shasta County, California, where he had for some time carried on a bakery business.
On June 1, 1931, he leased the premises and equipment to plaintiff for a period of two years from June 1, 1931, for $40 per month for the purpose of conducting a bakery. On the same day plaintiff executed and delivered to Hill two promissory notes, one payable December 1, 1931, for $120 to cover the first and last two payments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Poposkey v. MunkwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- La Jolla Casa deManana v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jegen v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.