Lindenberg v. MacDonald
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon a directed verdict in his action for damages (presumably for claimed constructive eviction) allegedly caused by defendants’ attempt, asserted by plaintiff to have been made in bad faith and unlawfully, to terminate a sublease (sometimes referred to as a lease) of real property. We have concluded that the trial court correctly determined *679that there was no evidence legally sufficient to show bad faith, constructive eviction, or any unlawful act by defendants, and that the judgment must be affirmed.
Defendants are husband and wife and are…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Stockton Dry Goods Co. v. GirshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.