Legal Opinion

Klein v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1919No. Civ. No. 2911PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the eviction of plaintiff from leased premises. Judgment was for plaintiff in the sum of $81 and costs for defendant. Plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll, contending that under the facts as found by the court he should recover a much larger sum.

The material facts as found by the court are substantially as follows: The plaintiff was in rightful and peaceable possession, under - a lease executed by defendant, of lots 1 and 2 of block A of the city of Pomona, together with an additional strip thirty-five feet in width on the easterly side of said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royce v. GuggenheimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Osmers v. FureyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McElvaney v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Skaggs v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Allen v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Robinson v. RaquetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Stark v. ShemadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API