Legal Opinion

Sobelman v. Maier

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8501PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of a contract wherein plaintiffs agreed to manufacture, furnish, and sell to defendants certain specialties protected by letters patent, and defendants were to receive and accept the same in certain amounts and at certain times and to pay for them as prescribed, which specialties were to be used in the making of an article of commerce known as “Cold Dogs.” Plaintiffs had judgment and defendants have appealed. They have but little to urge as to the merits of plaintiffs’ claims against them. Nevertheless they have urged much of a highly technical nature…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hale v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Atkinson v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API