Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. District Bond Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1935No. Civ. 9515PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment for damages for breach of contract.

Plaintiffs, doing business under the firm name of Atkinson & Reish, allege in their complaint that they entered into an agreement in writing with defendant on March, 16, 1931, wherein they agreed to bid for certain street improvement work in the city of Santa Barbara, California, and to perform the work if a contract was awarded to them, defendant agreeing to buy the warrant and bonds issued in payment of the work at a price of 96 per cent of their par value, if approved by an accredited bond…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Peek v. SteinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Richardson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Taylor v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API