Shoemaker v. Acker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo H. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was brought to recover damages in the sum of thirty-five thousand dollars for an alleged breach of a written contract between the parties. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of two thousand dollars, for which judgment was entered; and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The contract out of which the litigation arises was executed on the fourth day of October, 1892; and, as appellant relies mainly upon two points for a reversal, the parts of said contract necessary to be considered may be briefly stated as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Cederberg v. RobisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Hale v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.