Alder v. Drudis
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
In this action in claim and delivery and for declaratory relief, with a cross-complaint raising issues of fraud and misrepresentation, defendants and cross-complainants Drudis and Roberts appeal from an adverse judgment.
In 1941, plaintiff William F. Alder, an inventor, was the holder of United States letters patent on a device for producing third dimensional motion pictures, known as a polyscope. Plaintiff McMahon, in return for an interest in the patent, was engaged in efforts to develop and commercialize the device. Plans were under consideration for the organization of a development…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Zhang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.