Legal Opinion

Mathewson v. Carlson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1942No. 28491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the recovery of money had and received. The defendant A. R. Carlson did not appear and was defaulted. The defendant Omicron Company, Inc., answered, denying the right of the plaintiff to recover, and pleaded an affirmative defense. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact sustaining the right of recovery against both defendants. Judgment was entered against both defendants in the sum of one thousand dollars, from which the Omicron Company, Inc., alone appealed.

The appellant was a corporation organized under the laws of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Choukas v. CarrasWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Eichner v. CahillWashington Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shockley v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Valentine v. PowersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1948
  3. Floyd v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Omicron Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Cerkonek v. DibbleWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API