Legal Opinion

Eichner v. Cahill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1941No. 28336PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

Plaintiff, who was designated in the caption of the complaint as “Fred Eichner, Trustee,” brought this action to recover rental claimed to be due from the defendants under a written lease of real property.

After issue had been joined by the pleadings, the cause came on for trial before the court. Defendants objected to the introduction of any evidence and moved for dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest. The motion was denied. The only testimony in the record is that of plaintiff in his own behalf. He testified that he was the owner of the real property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Considerant v. . BrisbaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Townsend v. RosenbaumWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Goodfellow v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carr v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Seattle Trust Co. v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathewson v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Valentine v. PowersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1948
  3. Mine Holding Trust v. Keldon Pavlish, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API