Tucker v. Brown
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to have a trust declared, and also for an accounting. The defendants answered, with certain admissions and denials, and affirmatively pleaded the statute of limitations and that the property in controversy was transferred as a gift. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in a decree dismissing the action. From this decree, Wilmon Tucker, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Sarah E. Smith, deceased, appealed.
The facts will only be stated in so far as it appears necessary to present the questions which are controlling upon this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Knowles v. SlocumWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Millett v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Jackson v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Palmer v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re Estate of PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re Brown's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re Larson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.