Legal Opinion

Shockley v. Travelers Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1943No. 28917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit upon two life insurance policies, seeking to recover the benefits provided for therein in case of the permanent, total disability of the insured husband. Upon a trial before the court without a jury, findings were made, upon which the court entered judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant appealed.

In December, 1918, the appellant insurance company issued to respondent Wade Lee Shockley, who will hereinafter be referred to as though he were the sole respondent, a life insurance policy in the amount of ten thousand dollars, payable at his death to his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kuhnle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Storwick v. Reliance Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tutewiler v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mathewson v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ladley v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In re the Marriage of CavenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of Redmond v. KeznerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Lincoln Shiloh Associates Ltd. v. Mukilteo Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API