Cerkonek v. Dibble
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This is an action against the estate of Carl E. Tideman, deceased, on the theory that, by reason of a fraudulent misrepresentation by Mr. Tideman in his lifetime, his estate has been unjustly enriched. The alleged fraudulent misrepresentation was that there were sixty acres under irrigation on a 385-acre ranch which Albin P. Cerkonek and Anna Cerkonek, husband and wife, and their son, John E. Cerkonek, who are the plaintiffs in this action, acquired from Tideman in a trade-sale transaction. Plaintiffs allege that only twenty-nine acres were under irrigation.
The Cerkoneks and Tideman‘signed an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Ramsey v. MadingWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Baeder v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Jones v. MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Puget Sound National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Rogich v. DresselWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Corbett v. TicktinWashington Supreme Court · 1953