Legal Opinion

Choukas v. Carras

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1938No. 27091. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was instituted to restrain the sheriff of Kang county from selling upon execution certain real property standing in the name of James Choukas.

In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that he owned the real estate in question, namely, lot 6, block 103, Terry’s Second Addition to Seattle, and the sheriff was about to sell it to satisfy a judgment obtained by Carras Brothers against Frank Cassos and wife entered April 6, 1931.

Defendants Carras answered admitting the existence of the judgment, that the sheriff had levied on the property in question and was about to sell it to satisfy that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Russell v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tacoma Hotel, Inc. v. Morrison Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Forsyth v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Jarvis v. IrelandWashington Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Beakley v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Spokane v. O/S SABLEFISHWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Mathewson v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Choukas v. SeverynsWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API