Legal Opinion

Omicron Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1944No. 29305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On August 19, 1940, A. R. Carlson, a licensed and bonded real estate broker, purporting to act for William Mathewson, made an offer to Omicron Company, Inc. — hereinafter called Omicron — for an apartment house. The offer was accepted, an earnest money receipt was executed, and Carlson delivered to Omicron Mathewson’s check for one thousand dollars. On the next day, Mathewson, learning of the transaction by a letter from Omicron, went to its office, claiming that Carlson had acted without due authority, and demanded his check. Omicron refused the demand, had the check certified, and, upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mathewson v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tilly v. John DoeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Credit Bureau Corp. v. BecksteadWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Erickson v. Grubb & Ellis Commercial Brokerage Co. (In Re Previs)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
  5. Omicron Co. v. Central Surety & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API