Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Gunter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 4 Div. 649PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Statutory action of ejectment.

Appellant, the plaintiff below, deraigns title through a mortgage executed by defendant E.'B. Gunter, to the Federal Land Bank of New Orleans.

The defense was mental incapacity of the mortgagor to make a valid mortgage by reason of insanity.

’Admittedly a bona fide purchaser or mortgagee without notice of such insanity is now protected. Code, §§ 6822, 6823.

There was much conflicting evidence on the issue of insanity. Assuming this evidence made a jury question as to whether the mortgagor was insane to such extent as to render him incapable of executing a valid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Bjorkstam v. Federal Land BankWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Byrne v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Federal Land Bank v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Federal Land Bank v. Henderson, Black & Merrill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API