Legal Opinion

Bjorkstam v. Federal Land Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1926No. 19475. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Owing to the complicated appeals in this case, for the sake of brevity, the parties will be called plaintiffs and defendant, respectively, except the Federal Land Bank of Spokane, which will he called respondent. Originally, the plaintiffs consisted of husband and wife, but the wife having died, and her interests having passed solely to her husband, he was substituted as sole party plaintiff, and will be so designated herein.

The complaint of plaintiffs alleges that the Federal Land Bank of Spokane is a corporation, organized under the act of Congress, and that it has its principal place of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Johnston v. Milwaukee & Wyoming Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Griswold v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Western Security Co. v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Harrison National Bank v. AustinNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Federal Land Bank v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Byrne v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Geel v. ValiquettMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API