Legal Opinion
Federal Land Bank v. Henderson, Black & Merrill Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 10, 1949No. 4 Div. 451PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
The appeal is from a final decree of the circuit court of Crenshaw County, in equity. The bill was filed by the appellant, The Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, against Henderson, Black and Merrill Company, a corporation, and Jim Raiborn. By amendment R. T. Hughes was made a party respondent. The complainant, The Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, will be hereinafter referred to as the Bank and the respondent, Henderson, Black and Merrill Company, will be referred to as the Henderson Company.
On January 10, 1925, the respondent Jim Raiborn bought forty-five acres of land in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Shaddix v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- First Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Faulk v. CallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. LevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Brooks v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Collateral Inv. Co. v. PilgrimCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Alabama General InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- John D. Sibley v. The Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, and Board of Commissioners of the Mississippi State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.