Legal Opinion
Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 20, 1938No. 6 Div. 242PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from an interlocutory decree sustaining the complainant’s demurrers to defendants’ separate answers made cross-bills as authorized by the statute, Code 1923, § 6550.
The original bill, filed by the Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, is a statutory bill to quiet title to a tract of 87 acres of land, specifically described in the bill, located in the northeast 14 of section 6, township 10, range 2 east, Blount county, Ala., near the town of Summit.
The defendant, A. M. Hinds, Jr., answered denying that the complainant was in peaceful possession of the lands…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Reeder v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Friedman & Loveman v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. HestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Stewart v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Mantooth v. Federal Land BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Federal Land Bank v. Henderson, Black & Merrill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.