Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Houck

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1942No. File No. 8477PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This action was instituted by the Federal Land Bank of Omaha to recover a deficiency judgment against defendant Houck upon a mortgage indebtedness of one Scott. The complaint alleged that defendant had assumed and agreed to pay the Scott indebtedness. The answer pleads fraud. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for defendant. The appeal is from the judgment. The Federal Land Bank, hereinafter referred to as the Bank, moved for a directed verdict at the close of the testimony and predicates error upon the ruling of the trial court upon that motion.

The right to a review of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Schmidt v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bjorkstam v. Federal Land BankWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Chambers v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lang v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Baker v. JewellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API